3,505 New Palo Alto Homes
Thanks for taking
this short survey.
Please provide name and either e-mail address
or phone number below. We do not accept anonymous responses as they are less
thoughtful and less polite.
A. We will not spam you. We will protect your privacy.
B. Do not submit more than one survey response per person.
C. We may contact you to ask if we can attach your name to your survey
comments in a newspaper article on this survey. Otherwise, we may use your
survey comments in a newspaper article, but will keep you anonymous.
D. We may make all the survey responses public (via an on-line
spreadsheet), less name, e-mail, and phone. We may submit these survey
responses to Palo Alto City Council and to the Association of Bay Area
Governments.
| 2. Please provide a valid e-mail address or phone number:
|
| 3. Select your neighborhood or school community:
not sure?
|
Bay Area job growth is expected to lead to an
increase of at least two million residents in the next 30 years. While lower
levels of population growth might make traffic and environmental protection
easier to handle, continued growth is expected by the Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) and other organizations that study the Bay Area's future.
The Bay Area's economy is expected to grow a bit more rapidly than the nation as
a whole.
| 4. (OPTIONAL): Please provide any comments you have about this Bay Area population growth: |
Because of the Bay Area’s expected population
growth, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) has asked Palo Alto and
Stanford to add a total of 3,505 new homes by 2014. Many Bay Area cities besides
Palo Alto have been asked to add significantly to their population, and almost
all of these cities are unhappy about this request (especially Menlo Park,
Atherton, Cupertino, Piedmont, Pleasanton, and Larkspur).
ABAG's policy is to encourage new development in and around existing city and
suburban centers with an emphasis on reducing overall car traffic, preserving
open space and reducing the percent of workers living outside the region.
| 5. “It will be very hard to accommodate 3,505 new homes in Palo Alto” |
| 6. “Building these 3,505 homes in Palo Alto will make a contribution to reducing global warming and regional traffic” |
| 7. “Building these 3,505 homes in Palo Alto and in cities like Palo Alto in the region will increase our attractiveness for innovative companies to locate in the Valley. These homes will also help companies retain valued employees.” |
| 8. "Adding these 3,505 homes will increase pressure on the schools, roads, libraries and other public facilities"
|
| 9. "Palo Alto residents have some obligation to plan for these homes as part of supporting regional environmental and economic goals"
|
| 10. (OPTIONAL) Please provide any comments you have about questions or your answers on this page: |
| 11. (OPTIONAL) Many residents support ABAG's goals of environmental protection and reducing the overall amount of auto travel. Yet they are concerned about the impacts on their own neighborhoods and cities. If you do not think Palo Alto (and Stanford) should plan for these 3,505 homes, where should they be built? |
You are now at the end of the traditional part of
the survey. The questions on this page cover "visioning scenarios" and are
optional. (One of the survey authors has a special interest in such scenarios.)
SCENARIO 1:
By 2014, Palo Alto stays pretty much the same as
in 2007. The 3,505 new homes are built in Manteca, Modesto, and Merced, not in
Palo Alto. Cities such as Menlo Park, Atherton, and Cupertino also avoid their
unpopular housing allocations. Palo Alto traffic levels stay the same, but
regional auto usage increases. By year 2020, California GHG (greenhouse gas)
levels are 33% more than 1990 levels.
| 12. (OPTIONAL): Please rate Scenario 1 |
| 13. (OPTIONAL): Please add any comments you have about Scenario 1: |
SCENARIO 2:
Palo Alto adds 3,505 new "innovative growth"
homes by 2014.
In the past, Palo Alto City Council helped pioneer green, traffic-reducing
policies on Stanford and Stanford West Apartments. Stanford West residents
produce 75% less GHG (greenhouse gas) than the average Palo Alto resident,
primarily because they drive much less. As a condition of adding the new homes,
Palo Alto imposes similar traffic-reducing policies on the new housing. (Palo
Alto also ensures that energy-saving "green building" best practices are
followed.) New housing is created especially for deserving local workers, such
as Stanford Hospital nurses. Palo Alto also implements further traffic reducing
policies for Palo Alto workers, shoppers, and residents. As a result, traffic
and total auto trips remain at 2007 levels, despite increased population.
Because of Palo Alto’s inspired model, cities such as Menlo Park, Atherton, and
Cupertino follow Palo Alto’s lead. By year 2020, despite large population
growth, California GHG levels are back to 1990 levels. Even though significant
new housing is added in the Bay Area, the foothills remain preserved.
In order to balance the city's budget, Palo Alto copies recent suburban Bay Area
funding innovations to ensure that city services, parks, infrastructure, and
high quality education are fully funded.
| 14. (OPTIONAL): Please rate Scenario 2 |
| 15. (OPTIONAL): Please add any comments you have about Scenario 2: |
Thanks very much for your participation.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to persuade ten of your
neighbors to take this survey.
- Irvin Dawid, Sierra Club California Air
Quality Committee, University South neighborhood
- Steve Levy, Center for Continuing Study of the
California Economy, University South neighborhood
- Steve Raney, Cities21, Crescent Park
neighborhood
- Scott Ward, Classic Communities, Downtown
North neighborhood